Evaluation
From the feedback, the audience responses suggest that the rough cut can be further improved. In the first question, "What needs to be improved?" the option that was chosen the most was Editing. Out of the 6/6 participants had voted for editing. 3/5 participants voted for camerawork. This could be because some of the shots used were shaky and/or not in focus. From this feedback, both camera work and editing need to be improved for the second draft.
In the second question "Is the narrative easy to understand?" all six participants had chosen yes. This means that the narrative doesn't need to be improved for the transition cut.
The third questions "Is the music video so far professional looking?" all participants and said no. This could be because in some of the shots, the actors had started walking a few seconds after the shot was recorded. When doing the second cut, the shots need to be edited so that the actors are not standing around for a few seconds before they start moving.
The fourth question "Would you recommend this music video to your friends?" the majority had stated that they wouldn't this could be because of the editing and camerawork previously mentioned. This will be improved for the transition cut for the music video. However, a few of the participants and stated that they would share this video with their friends.
The final question asking the participants to rate the question had all given the music video one out of five stars. This shows that a lot of improvement is needed for our transition cut.
No comments:
Post a Comment